I realized that counselling is inextricably linked to teaching because students often came to me not only for academic matters but also for their personal concerns, whether connected to studies or not, and I grappled with concerns about whether I was giving correct advice. All I knew was that I am not judgmental about people’s life choices, I don’t require anyone to seek my agreement and that I believe they have to be willing to carry out the solutions.
I have always found it a mystery that I seem to attract people burdened with their secrets. Continue reading →
Lesson planning and materials development are inextricably linked to curriculum development. Lesson planning covers preparations made for the day-to-day or lesson-to-lesson level, while curriculum development involves a decision-making process regarding the subject matter coverage of a particular group based on expectations for knowledge and experience to be accomplished over a prolonged period of time.
The word “curriculum” is generally defined as a set of prescribed subjects or courses that students must pass in order to move up from one level of education to another. Each level of education is characterized by and planned for with consideration to academic skills that conform to age-grade expectations determined by academic institutions. View the pictures →
LITNUM class held in a classroom/multipurpose room (our second venue), which was later used to house 5 families
A literacy and numeracy program guided by the more progressive definitions of literacy, located within the framework of the whole language philosophy, and conducted with feminist counselling principles effectively becomes a tool for the empowerment of women.
Women’s subjectivities, contexts and particular situations are valued in the conduct and creation of the program.
The program is fully participatory, with conceptions of classroom power redefined and classroom power redistributed. Continue reading →
The Center for Women’s Resources developed three manuals for previous LITNUM classes. The first manual, Oryentasyon ng Programang Literasi at Numerasi ng Kababaihang Aytas, was published in 2004. This was followed in 2005 by the second manual, which is the counterpart of the manual for the Aetas, entitled Oryentasyon ng Programang Literasi and Numerasi ng Kababaihang Maralitang Tagalunsod. The third manual is a continuation of the 2005 release Literasi at Numerasi Para sa mga Kababaihang Maralitang Lungsod – Ikalawang Andana. Continue reading →
The discussion on curriculum development earlier underscores the view that a curriculum should be academically ordained by an institution and should be pre-packaged and finite. In light of the manuals already developed, it is evident that the planners do not adhere to this prescribed academic thinking.
As such, I would like to emphasize that the development of new manuals should not be bound to the previously prepared manuals. Development literacy and literacy as a situated social practice accurately postulate that the curricula of differing groups will grow out of and respond to the set of realities of a particular group, with its own socioeconomic realities, needs, and group culture, with set ways of doing things. Continue reading →
at the 30th Anniversary Gathering of the CWR in December 2012
The amount and the quality of time that I had the chance to spend with the Center for Women’s Resources has afforded me many opportunities to observe how true they are to their mantra of investigating women’s situations and serving and empowering women, and how they extend this philosophical regard to each other, as they have done to us fieldworkers as well. To learn and participate in a highly-acclaimed organization doing research on the level of international and national standards where the staff operates within a three-tiered hierarchy with a flat organization’s behavior is simply amazing and humbling. Continue reading →
Jelina (Jeng) Tetangco and I wrote the research paper “Women and the All UP Unions: Mainstreaming the Women’s Agenda – An Integrated Field Work Paper” as the final requirement for our field work with the All UP Workers Union and the All UP Academic Employees Union from November 2007 to March 2008.
It was our honor to have done fieldwork and research on the organization’s first analysis conducted of women’s participation, the mainstreaming of their agenda, and the consolidation of the gender committee and All UP Women’s Solidarity.
Members and Friends of the All UP Unions
This paper has been divided into the following blogs:
“Women and the All UP Unions: Mainstreaming the Women’s Agenda – An Integrated Field Work Paper” written Jelina Tetangco and Cindy Cruz-Cabrera | March 2008